The document proposed by the EIS would cover areas including equality, access to teachers and the right to be taught free from disruption by unruly pupils.This sounds like more of the politically correct nonsense that we expect from unions. What on earth does "equality" mean in this context? And who's stopping children from having "access" to their teachers at the moment? No one, I suspect. Freedom from disruption, on the other hand, is a fine idea, but the only problem is that it's incompatible with the very politically correct climate that teachers have done so much to create. Schools need to be free to get rid of disruptive pupils. They also need to be free to set the curriculum and to get rid of bad staff. That means employing professional not unionised teachers. In other words we need to privatise the lot of them.
The union wants children to be at the centre of the decision-making process.
Monday, 29 December 2003
Schools need shareholders, not "charters"
I read that the teachers' trade union wants a new charter for pupils: