A libertarian returns to Scotland
"Freedom and Whisky gang thegither"
- Robert Burns
Monday, 15 July 2002
The return of Old Labour
Wherever you are, whatever you are doing - big brother is watching you!
The beautiful game
Peter Dawson, secretary of the Royal and Ancient, says robustly:
We do believe in rights of assembly and feel there's a place for all-male clubs and all-women clubs.And Gillian Stewart, winner of the 1984 Women's Euro Open, says:
I have absolutely nothing against men-only clubs, and think it would be very wrong if they were forced into accepting women members merely to be politically correct. If I had the wherewithal to start a club of my own and decided I wanted to have a women-only club, why should I not be allowed to do so?Absolutely correct. What the Royal and Ancient should tell the government is that they won't hold the Open ever again should they be forced into accepting mixed-sex golf clubs. Let the politicians then explain the loss of "£80 million in the long term to the local economy".
Friday, 12 July 2002
Scotland's shame
John Law was a pioneer of the art of creating money out of thin air. But the article puts it like this:He alone among his contemporaries fully grasped the notions of credit and the potential of paper money. It was not until 1931 that Britain left the gold standard - yet Law had realised that reserves of a precious metal do not serve the needs of trade as early as 1705...
But the News goes on to say:
It was a massive bull market to make the 1980's yuppie era look like pocket money day for five year olds. The shares started at 500 livres each, quickly doubled, and then marched from 1,000 to 10,000 livres before the inevitable collapse.
Indeed so. But the article continues:Yet Law's economic theories, despite his French disaster, are vindicated today. We not only use paper money but also plastic too. Law would have understood, as he said himself that money is "a functional medium with no intrinsic value..."
"Vindicated today!" The recent stock market and housing booms - both here and in the US - are the consequences of the creation of huge amounts of unbacked money by central banks. We are now seeing the beginnings of the inevitable collapse which always follows such governmental speculation. Unfortunately, millions of ordinary people will be wiped out financially - the politicians who caused this tragedy will, as always, blame others.
New job for Margo?
What is the SNP for?
Crime and punishment
Thursday, 11 July 2002
Liberty debate
Wednesday, 10 July 2002
The fourth estate
The black community hailed IDS.
Headline in The Scotsman:
Duncan Smith fails to score on streets of Brixton with Tories' anti-drug message.
Supporting freedom makes you younger!
From EU Observer 10.07.2002 - 09:38 CETMilton Friedman: EU to collapse within 10 years The EU and its single currency euro will exist for some 5-10 years and then will just breakup, according to 86-year old Prof Milton Friedman, one of the leading libertarian economists. As reasons for such an EU disintegration, the Nobel Laureate points to linguistic and cultural differences as well as external economic factors, the Izvestia reports. According to the US economist, giving up national monetary policy in eurozone countries leads to a higher unemployment rate as an immediate result of economic problems. Its is the "Achilles' heel" of the euro, Mr Friedman believes. If the monetary policy of the European Central Bank (ECB) is correct for a country like Ireland, for Germany it is absolutely not positive, he points out. Press Articles Novosti Izvestia Written by Marcin Frydrych Edited by Honor Mahony
This report is interesting in two ways:
First, the coming collapse of the EU is excellent news.
Secondly, given that Milton Friedman was 89 years old earlier this month and is now apparently 86, supporting freedom makes you younger!
Tuesday, 9 July 2002
The new Scottish parliament building
The cost of the Prime Minister's decision to veto Calton Hill, in Edinburgh, which is what Holyrood has been all about....
It is not generally realised in England that almost everyone up here assumed that the Scottish parliament would be located in the former Royal High School building on Calton Hill which already contains a suitable debating chamber. Well before the first Scottish parliamentary elections were held, the Westminster cabinet decided that a new building would be constructed in Edinburgh. This was imposed on us because it was thought that the Calton Hill site was a "nationalist shibboleth" - there had been a twenty year vigil by Scottish Nationalists outside the Royal High School building since the failure of the first devolution referendum in 1979. So, Tony Blair in London has imposed a £300 million cost on Scottish taxpayers rather than let us use an existing and more centrally located building - all because he wrongly thought that Scots associated Calton Hill with a particular political party.
Taxes on business
Corporation tax cannot be treated in isolation. It is the overall tax burden, rather than any specific element that is likely to have an impact on the health of our economy..
Well, I certainly think that the overall tax burden is far too high, but I also concur with Professor Reismann's view on the particular harm caused by taxes on business.
Monday, 8 July 2002
A good read
Today, I came across this passage:What has enabled Sweden to have one of the world's highest burdens of taxation and, at the same time, to remain a modern country, more or less advancing, is the fact that the tax burden in Sweden falls far more heavily on the average Swedish wage earner than it does on Swedish business.........If Swedish business had to bear the burden of taxation borne by Swedish wage earners, the Swedish economy would long since have been in ruins.
Reismann's point is that taxation on capital and profits is far more harmful in the long run even for the wage earners because ultimately wages depend on capital formation and expansion. It occurred to me that Ireland has been adopting a similar policy of taxing wage earners relatively more than business. Some in the SNP seem to be arguing for a similar policy in Scotland. I wonder if they have been reading Reismann!
Accounting problems
Sunday, 7 July 2002
More on the ID cards row
Labour MSPs refused to comment on Blunkett's statement, saying the issue of ID cards was a reserved (to Westminster) matter.
But Mike Rumbles, the Illiberal Democrat MSP for West Aberdeenshire is actually showing signs of liberalism: If they are supposed to be voluntary, then why is it an issue that Scots might not have them? One minute we are told it is an inoffensive and voluntary scheme, then we are told we must all have them so as to fight terror.This is not about Scotland not wanting to combat fraud, this is about Scots knowing that ID cards will not work. I think that David Blunkett has forgotten all about devolution.
With the SNP and Tories also making anti-ID card noises, there could be a majority in the Scottish parliament against their introduction.
Friday, 5 July 2002
The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth
growing its market share on the key Prestwick to London route
Well, no it isn't. Ryanair's market share of the Prestwick to London route is 100% for the simple reason that it's the only operator. No doubt it is growing market share on the overall Glasgow (both airports) to London routes but that's not the same thing. I always have a little laugh when I read in the press about plans for possible "third" runway at Heathrow - yes, there are three there already. And what about a possible "second" runway at Edinburgh which is regularly discussed by the media? I landed on Edinburgh's existing second runway quite recently.
I happen to notice these stories because I have an interest in aviation, but how much else is wrong in newspapers?
African gold standard?
Mbeki and Mlambo-Ngcuka will have to work exceptionally hard and cleverly to assure investors that the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Bill is not the beginning of another stereotypical African slippery slope.
It looks like one to me.
Thursday, 4 July 2002
A modest proposal
Instructions for the disposal of the Blunkett (dis-)Benefit Card
Equipment Required:
1 One work bench with a vice
2 One clamp
3 One hammer (the heavier the better)
4 One electric drill
5 One Tungsten Carbide by 1/2" drill bit (warning do not use metric "equivalent" size)
6 One centre punch
9 One poker
10 one fire
11 One piece of writing paper
12 One personal computer with a word processing programme
13 One computer printer
14 One see-through plastic envelope
15 one second class stamp
Execute the following actions:
1, Place the card face up on the work bench
2. Clamp the card with the clamp so that it will not move
3. Taking the hammer in your right hand strike the card in the area of the embedded chip as hard as you can twenty five times
4. If the embedded chip has not thinned and spread out enough take the red-hot poker and apply it to the chip until it becomes red hot.
"SAFETY WARNING" No 1– do not allow the plastic to catch fire as it will not doubt exude noxious fumes and you will end up thigh deep in Health and Safety busybodies!
"SAFETY WARNING" No 2 – have a 5 gallon bucket of cold water standing by adjacent to your workbench
5. Repeat action number 3
6. Drop the card in the bucket of water to cool it down
7. By now the chip should be sufficiently thin for the next operation
8. Take the card out of the bucket of water and lay it down face up on a block of wood that is approximately 4" thick and 2" wider than the card all round
9. Place the block of wood in the vice so that the card is trapped, with the front facing you
10. With the centre punch and hammer punch the centre of the chip – one blow should be sufficient
11. Fit the ½" tungsten carbide drill bit into the chuck of the drill and tighten it up
12. Plug in the drill to the mains socket outlet and switch on the drill
13. Using the centre you have just punched, drill right through the card in the area of the chip
14. Make sure that you remove all of the chip and leave a nice neat hole, if necessary re-drill with a ¾" tungsten carbide drill bit (warning do not use metric "equivalent" size)
15. Also make sure that your name and photograph are still clearly visible on the front of the card
16. Retire from your workshop to your word processor
17. Place the card in the see-through plastic envelope, and include the following letter
Mr Blunkett,
The Secretary of State for Home Affairs,
The Home Office,
Queen Annes Mansions,
Petty France,
London SW1
Sir,
Please find enclosed one modified and redundant Blunkett (Dis-) Benefit card, which is
1. Prima Facie evidence of an act of Treason on your part (and be advised that as required by law, I have notified the local magistrates accordingly),
2. A gross violation of the rights of the individual,
3. Contrary to the common law of both England and Scotland,
4. Contrary to Magna Carta,
5. Contrary to the Bill of Rights (1689),
6. Prima Facie evidence that you are one of Moscow’s most exalted cadre called "Lenin’s Useful Idiots".
Yours sincerely
18 Seal the envelope, apply the second class stamp, and pop it in the post.
Will Scotland say "no" to Identity Cards?
It added that if the card related to reserved matters such as immigration, national security or social security, it would apply right across the UK.But if the scheme was to cover devolved policy areas, such as health or transport, Scotland would make its own decision.
The potential for friction between Westminster and Holyrood is immense and could give anti-ID card parties a useful advantage at the coming Holyrood elections. Serves Labour right.
Imprisoned minds
But do we actually need any new prisons? What is really needed is a complete rethink of how to deal with criminals. All “genuine” crimes have victims. The role of the state should be to catch criminals and make them fully compensate the victim as well as paying for the relevant police and court costs. That would be a proper system of justice and I suspect one which would need fewer prisons, private or public.
Wednesday, 3 July 2002
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer
An editorial in Business AM today says:The pro-euro campaign needs to find some direction and dedication. Not because it is necessarily right - it is too early to make a judgment on what is best for Britain - but to ensure that there is a fair and informed debate on the issue.
This is truly extraordinary. Surely everyone understands that the Euro is a political project which is designed to create a new country - Europe. How can it be "too early to make a judgment" on whether we should abolish the UK? If you don't know now, you never will.
Monday, 1 July 2002
Big Brother - evict Tony Blair!
Does Eric Joyce MP really believe that: "the government is going to make it clear that there will be no plan for people to carry cards compulsorily"? Pull the other one.
Rural affairs
What I would like to see is fair play from the UK government through taking steps to reduce the bureaucracy and red tape that's strangling our industry, and removing the competition restrictions which prevent dairy co-operatives from coming together to form larger, more powerful lobbying and negotiating organisations to deal with major milk buyers, including the supermarket chains.
Once again, it's the government that causes problems when it trys to "help."