Glasgow East

I drove through the constituency again on Monday afternoon and like before it seemed clear that the SNP had by far the greater visible presence.

But what's this in today's Scotsman?

IN NUMBERS LABOUR

3,000 posters put up on lamp posts

and:

SNP

5,000 posters put up on lampposts

3,000 to 5,000? It didn't seem like that to me. Nothing like it, in fact.

And here's a local's opinion. Derek White says:

"I walk to the bus stop and all I see are SNP banners or flags. I haven't seen a single Labour flag nor have I received any campaign literature. It's all been from the SNP."

Perhaps it's really true that the Scottish media is stuck in the Labour camp.

SNaPping the Polis

I see that the SNP has made a bit of a "gaffe". Well, according to the Scotsman that is:

Labour has criticised the SNP after it emerged a picture of two police officers was put on a leaflet distributed as part of the Nationalists' Glasgow East by-election campaign.

Here's the apology:

Central Scotland Deputy Chief Constable Iain MacLeod, whose officers feature on the pamphlet, told the newspaper that the image, which was taken as part of an official ministerial visit, had been used without the knowledge of the force.

An SNP spokeswoman said they had issued an apology to the officers involved through the Scottish Police Federation.

She added: "The police are an apolitical organisation who are doing a fantastic job in Glasgow East and across the country."

What the SNP should have said is that the police are our servants and until they stop harassing photographers they should stop being so hypocritical.

Countering the Scorched Earth policy

The Spectator's Fraser Nelson thinks that Gordon Brown is adopting a "Scorched Earth" policy designed to destroy an incoming Conservative administration in 2010:

The Scorched Earth policy has begun. The FT has a hugely significant story – that the Treasury is “working privately on plans to reform Gordon Brown’s fiscal rules” which would “initially allow for increased borrowing”. In the vernacular, Brown has realised that if the Tories win the next election the he is now spending with Cameron’s Gold Card – every by-election bribe, every union sellout will be funded by borrowing with the bill sent to D. Cameron Esq. Cameron will have to tax us to pay for what Brown is today spending.

There's an easy solution.

The Tories should wait until Brown calls the next general election and then not put up any candidates. Labour would romp home and bear full responsibility for the coming crash. After all, ZaNuLab itself introduced this very tactic at Haltemprice and Howden, did it not?

The most important story in Scotland

And it's not Glasgow East.

Jeff from SNP Tactical Voting gets it:

RB Afraid, RB Very Afraid

Less than a month ago I blogged about the worrying state of RBS' share price. I was worried about a share price of £2.30, especially when shares were trading at £7 only a year ago.

Well, in less than a month, that £2.30 is now down to a very, very troubling £1.70.

Last night the Royal closed at 167.70, down 7.06% for the day. HBOS was down 4.41%.

Scotland's economy is very dependent on financial services. And the uniquely centralised nature of the UK makes the situation even more precarious.

Jeff writes:

Royal Bank of China, coming to your high street soon. Mark my words....

I wouldn't be surprised at all, and such an outcome would be disastrous for Edinburgh and Scotland as a whole. Power, influence and the top jobs follow the headquarters.

But an RBS takeover isn't the worst prospect facing us right now. What should really worry us is the survival of the entire banking system itself. And it's not like we havnae been telt. Is it?

In conclusion, here's a movie from (near) Hollywood.

Robert Burns International Airport?

No, I don't think so.

Some folk think that Prestwick Airport should be renamed in honour of the national poet.

I don't agree. Nothing against Rabbie you understand - after all, I attended Ayr Academy for three years. It's just that I think airports should be named after places, not people.

I think that the Americans made a mistake in renaming Idlewild as J.F. Kennedy. It's wrong that Roissy is now known as Charles de Gaulle. And Belfast City shouldn't be called George Best, even though I once did see him score a goal. Come to think of it, what was wrong with Speke?

The problem's this: what happens when these local worthies go out of fashion? The airport's name has to be changed again and perhaps again. At great cost to the taxpayer.

The way things are going I expect to read that Glasgow (Paisley, actually) is to be renamed "The Margaret Curran International Airport", should the Glasgow East electorate vote for the ZanuLab candidate thus saving the incumbent regime.

What's brought all this on is the news from Indianapolis:

Shortly after he was appointed to the Indianapolis Airport Authority in January, Randall Tobias started getting polite, well-written letters from people who want to restore Col. Harvey Weir Cook's name to the airport's.

Then Mayor Greg Ballard, who appointed Tobias, mentioned he supports the change to honor the World War I flying ace killed during World War II in the South Pacific.

And then the City-County Council overwhelmingly passed a resolution supporting the change.

The vote was 25 to 3 in favour of the change of name. Overwhelming indeed.

Surely the elected politicians know what the locals want. Not quite. An opinion poll in Indianapolis indicates otherwise:

The outcome: 49.5 percent wanted to add Weir Cook's name, while 50.5 percent did not.

I think there's a lesson here. Politicians are motivated by self-interest, just like the rest of us. Yes, I know that's shocking news for some but that's the way it is.

Politicians like the idea of naming airports after people. Who knows, they also might be so honoured one day. But normal folk - the 50.5 percent - realise that they're going to have to foot the bill for all these changes.

This is just another reason why the state should be allowed to do as little as possible.

Or less.

Glasgow East

I was over in Weegieland earlier today and took a drive through the constituency. The main industries seem to be pubs and tanning salons. Where's Tommy Sheridan when you need him? Oh, and I noticed a large football stadium.

Anyway, judging from the signs on lampposts the current state of affairs seems to be something like this:

SNP: 500

Conservative: 200

Labour: 10

Lib Dem : 10

And all of the Lib Dem messages were on the front of what looked like their headquarters on Shettleston Road.

Extraordinary quote of the day

It comes from the Spectator Business:

Huntington is impressed by how the Guardian has responded to eroding readership. ‘They’ve transformed themselves from a lefty broadsheet published in Manchester and London to being one of the world’s great opinionated journalism brands,’ he says. ‘It has more readers in Texas now than in the UK.’

Good grief: perhaps the Guardian will become liberal again.

In the Manchester sense and not the Texan one of course.

There's Gold in Them Thar Hills

I've just come across this piece of news:

Britain's unexploited mineral wealth could be about to come into its own: with the price of gold predicted to soar above £500 an ounce over the next six months, drilling at one of the UK's only workable gold mines is about to restart after years of idleness.

Exploration work to uncover the true amount and value of the precious metal deposited at Cononish mine, near the village of Tyndrum in Scotland, is due to start any day.

This is welcome. Better still would be for Alex Salmond to announce that an independent Scotland would adopt a gold standard. If Alex were really radical he'd advocate a free market in currencies.

(Disclosure: I bought my gold shares when the price was £200 per ounce.)

Adam Smith

Adam Smith in his Burqa!
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Piper, Professor and Sculptor
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Madsen Pirie
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Eamonn Butler and Brian Monteith
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Adam Smith
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Adam Smith
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Alexander Stoddart and Vernon Smith
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Adam Smith
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Adam Smith
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

The Adam Smith Experience

As reported by Mr Eugenides the first event was an excellent debate held on Thursday evening.

From Mr E:

Your scribe was honoured to participate in a debate last night alongside the ASI President Madsen Pirie, former Scottish Secretary Michael Forsyth, and assorted well-intentioned but hopelessly muddled lefties. A good time was had by all, although Mr E partook perhaps too liberally of the free bar.

Around a couple of hundred folk attended and most did indeed enjoy the free bar that was available both before and after the rather boisterous debate. Needless-to-say, the House supported the cause of the "invisible hand".

On Friday morning Mrs F&W and I went along to the High Street and were rather surprised to see the great economist wearing a burqa! Not only the hand was invisible at this point. A "local" asked me what was going on.

"They're unveiling a statue of Adam Smith," I replied.

"Never heard of him."

"The greatest Scotsman who ever lived," I informed him. "And a drinking partner of David Hume whom you can see up the street."

That sort of relationship seemed to command a degree of respect.

The Edinburgh "market" community turned out in force. The ceremony started on the dot, as one would expect for a privately funded statue. The string was pulled, the "burqa" fell away as planned, people applauded and a group in See You Jimmy Hats had their photos taken in front of the man who gave the world prosperity. The invited guests were piped across the High Street into the City Chambers where we enjoyed a free lunch (free at the point of consumption anyway) and heard an excellent and libertarian talk by the sculptor Alexander Stoddart.

On Friday evening a sumptuous dinner was held in the Playfair Library at which we were addressed by R Emmett Tyrrell, editor of the American Spectator, and Professor David Purdie who used to live a few doors away from me in Prestwick when we were teenagers.

I was placed at Table 13. At each table someone won a bottle of Gaelic Whisky provided by Sir Iain Noble, founder of the distillery. For me it was a case of "lucky 13", perhaps helped by Sir Iain being at this table himself. I won the bottle and Table 13 consumed about half of it before I headed off home.

As the saying goes: Freedom and Whisky gang thegither.

Adam Smith statue

The statue will be unveiled in the Royal Mile on Friday 4th July. I'll be there and look forward to meeting any readers who are present.

Back in 2004 I took a series of photographs of the proposed site on behalf of the Adam Smith Institute. Here's one of them:

Bent or merely bendy?

That is indeed the question.

Iain Dale has stirred up a bit of a hornet's nest.

Wendy Alexander was a politician clearly out of her depth as Labour leader in Scotland. But she was not on the take. And for that reason alone, I take no joy in seeing that her career in politics has been brought to a premature end.

I think it's fair to say that most of Iain's commenters aren't quite so sanguine.

This one is typical:

I would have more sympathy with your gentle views if ordinary citizens were also treated so indulgently. Members of a political class which has created many offences of strict liability, where lack of criminal intent is irrelevant, are entitled to precisely as much sympathy as we would get if charged with such offences; i.e. none, zero, zilch, zip, nada.

If ignorance of the law is no excuse for us, Iain, why the hell would it be an excuse for the people who make the law? If our inability to understand their confusing and contradictory legislative excretions is no defence to us, why the hell should it be a defence for them?

I worry, as you Conservatives get nearer to power, that you do not have any better attitude to its use and abuse than the petty tyrants who govern us now. Please differentiate yourselves clearly. We want to believe. We want to give you a chance. But your apparent sympathy with the devil is not going to inspire much confidence.

I appreciated the post on Big Rab's site:

Anyway getting back to wee Wendy. She is a university educated, bright and intelligent person. She has a staff at her disposal, paid for by the tax payer whose duty is to make sure all the i’s are dotted and t’s crossed. The rules and regulations she was subject to were no worse or more complicated than those inflicted on the rest of us. Those rules and regulations were voted through by politicians just like her.

Sure let us simplify rules and regulations as Ian Dale suggests. However lets do it for everyone and not just the political class.

I think Iain's right to say that Wendy didn't consciously set about to line her pockets at the taxpayers' expense. But it's clear to me that politicians like Wendy really don't understand that even when they do obey the rules they're living off the rest of us. Or at least off those of us who pay taxes. And contrary to what seems to be believed down south that includes plenty of us here in Scotland.

So is it simply a matter of making sure that MP's, MSP's and MEP's obey the rules? I don't think so. Of course, they should obey the rules but I believe that more is at stake. The real question is this: what is the state for? How big should it be? What are its proper functions? Removing my anarcho-capitalist hat for the moment I'd say that the state should do no more than organise protection against aggressors - domestic and foreign. That's it. Nothing more. No state provided education, health or welfare systems. In such a world politicians would have an extremely limited role. Almost all would be part-time and furthermore they should be financially self-sufficient. There would be no need for aspiring politicians to seek campaign funds. They would be chosen according to their achievements in the "real" world.

Would Wendy be elected in such a society? Probably not. But hardly any others from the present crop would be chosen either.

Separated at birth?

"First female Scots top cop speaks"

Astounding, isn't it? But it must be true: the BBC is the source:

Scotland's only female police chief has spoken for the first time since taking up the role.

Now if we can only get the blokes back on the beat perhaps they'll learn to speak too...

Capital punishment

I'm a wee bit ambivalent about capital punishment. I've got no problem with a householder using lethal force against a violent intruder. And, like in Texas (I believe), the said householder should be regarded as a hero. Furthermore, I'd suggest a suitable reward like not being liable for Council Tax for ten years.

But I'm not so sure about the state using capital punishment. It's not like the state gets most things right. Perhaps an exception could be made when the accused has been caught in the act by a large number of very reliable witnesses as well as being recorded on CCTV. It's not like we're short of cameras...

But here in Edinburgh I note that someone has evaded our local form of capital punishment:

A BUILDER of up-market flats has sparked protests by moving the social housing element of its scheme two miles down the road to Leith.

Council housing chiefs have been criticised for allowing Dutch developer MaB to build the affordable flats near the dock's former red light district rather than in Trinity.

Note the weasel words.

By "social housing element of its scheme" they really mean the properties that will probably be used to house unsocial people. And what about "affordable"? This is code for affordable to those who vote the right way. The houses in Trinity are affordable. To their buyers.

In fact, I'm beginning to think that use of the word "affordable" may justify capital punishment.

Along with "appropriate".

This nonsense is even affecting Ayr United's plan for a new stadium:

A spokeswoman for South Ayrshire Council said the council was "fully supportive" of Ayr United. She said consent had been given for the Heathfield stadium but complications regarding affordable housing provision due to be built on the Somerset Park site had delayed the signing of the legal agreement.

Enough of this.

Jane Jacobs explained why the state should be kept quite separate from the market. Let the state catch the criminals and let the market house the people.

Quote of the day

From this letter in the Scotsman:

If we were to be offered the chance to vote to leave the EU, the choice of answers should be simply "Yes" or "Oink".

Perth AirshowSpitfire

Spitfire
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

More here.

Hold the Front Page

There are five stories on the front page of today's Scotland on Sunday.

First we have this:

The Scottish Government last month unveiled controversial new plans to curb smoking, by proposing a ban on cigarettes being displayed in shops. And ministers south of the border have suggested scrapping packs of 10 cigarettes because of their popularity among young smokers.

Then this one:

BUSINESSES will be encouraged to monitor the weight of their employees as part of a £56m Government plan to tackle Scotland's obesity epidemic.

Workers will type in their weight every morning – using Government-provided software – allowing occupational health staff to spot significant weight gain and offer early help, under the scheme unveiled by ministers. The Government also plans to appoint a full-time official charged with liaising with Scottish food firms and encouraging them to make products healthier.

And if that's not enough read this:

A GOVERNMENT minister has drawn a link between the damage to society caused by child pornography and people who drink too much at home.

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill, right, made the comparison as he justified the state cracking down on private behaviour which creates public harm. He said excessive drinking at home "impacts on the rights of others" by making demands on the health service, and often harms family and community life.

Now here this: LEAVE US ALONE. The only proper role of government is to defend us from those who initiate force or fraud. Government isn't our nanny.

The fourth story is about Zimbabwe. We haven't gone that far yet but sometimes one wonders...

Story number five is about Sean Connery.

The government now wants to regulate our smoking, eating and drinking. Where's James Bond when we need him?

Davis v Smeaton?

Love and Garbage has an excellent response to Luke Akehurst's suggestion that Labour:

should find a Martin Bell type candidate - preferably a recently retired senior police officer, or a survivor or relative of a victim of a terrorist attack, to run under the following 5 word candidate description: "Independent - for detaining terrorism suspects"."

Bomb victim Rachel from North London also puts Akehurst in his place:

This is not about being soft on terrorism. It is about being tough about standing up for the things terrorists attack. Democracy. Freedom. The right to walk about without fear.

People have died to protect our freedoms. You should think on what you throw away so lightly.

But it looks possible that Labour may take up Akehurst's idea:

An intriguing new name has emerged as a possible candidate against David Davis in the Haltemprice and Howden byelection, expected on July 10.

It's John Smeaton, the baggage handler hero who won the Queen's Gallantry Medal for helping police foil a terrorist attack at Glasgow Airport last summer.

I'm told that the Labour Party - despite signalling so far that it will not field a candidate in the byelection - is trying to persuade Smeaton to stand as an anti-terrorist candidate.

Apart from the sheer cynicism of such a move, I wonder if Labour has thought this through.

We'd have a by-election in Middle England in which the local man, and, until now, the local MP, would be campaigning on behalf of values that would almost certainly be labelled as "English".

In the Labour corner, supporting a further extension of state power would be someone who, hero though he may be, is even more than Gordon Brown obviously Scottish to the core.

I can think of few things more likely to render the Union asunder.

Libertarians donate to Davis

As Finance Director of the Libertarian Alliance I am pleased to let readers know that we have pledged a donation to the David Davis election campaign.

Bought and Sold for British Gold

Sic a parcel of rogues in a province.

I used to be quite proud of the fact that the British governments of all parties would stand by the Unionists of Northern Ireland. Especially as it seems likely that most mainlanders feel no kinship with the people of the Province.

Today the DUP has stabbed us in the back.

I now say: to hell with them; kick Northern Ireland out of the Union. The UK's probably going to break up anyway. Let's start the process by expressing our outrage at this sell-out of Britain's traditional liberties.

Nuts!

That's the title of a great book about a great company: Southwest Airlines.

But nutty behaviour has now spread to American Airlines too:

L.I. Family Suing American Airlines Over Peanuts.

Mother Says 4-Year-Old Son Has Life-Threatening Allergy, And That By Serving Nuts His Civil Rights Were Violated

Actually, to sort of quote Bill Clinton (remember him?): I feel their pain. Let me explain.

Around 15 years ago I flew to and from the US on American. And guess what? Some years ago my local MP became Chancellor of the Exchequer. And he's totally nuts. Obviously there's a connection here. Time to contact my lawyer...

Gordon's ASBO

Seen in Newcastle earlier today:

Gordon's ASBO
Originally uploaded by David Farrer

Oh Frank!

I often think that any future break-up of the UK would probably happen because of simple misunderstandings. All too many Scots seem to think that large numbers of English folk are rich, bloated capitalists who drive around in Bentleys. Even the Scots-born Birmingham MP who managed his party's disastrous election campaign in the town that builds Bentleys seems to think like that!

But the English get Scotland wrong too. Even Frank Field, the only sensible person in the Labour Party.

Here he is in today's Telegraph:

With no residential care-home fees, Scots, unlike the English, don’t face having to sell their homes to pay them.

But it's not true!

What's provided in Scotland is "Free" Personal Care. That's help with things like personal hygiene. The cost of the accommodation itself is born by the resident - just like in England. Now, as a libertarian, I don't think that the state should be paying for any of this. But at least we should get the facts right. As far as I can see, every single blogger and journalist in England believes that retirement and nursing homes in Scotland are provided by the taxpayer. It ain't so.