Do they really want this brand image?

One of the Scottish Socialist Party leaders is calling for an independence convention:

Alan McCombes, national policy co-ordinator of the SSP, has produced a 5000-word policy document - to be debated on Sunday at the SSP's national council - outlining the socialists' proposed strategy for hastening independence. Mr McCombes argues the most obvious vehicle is a convention based on the Scottish constitutional convention of the 1990s which heralded devolution.

It would be encouraged by the fact there are more MSPs in favour of it now than before the May 1 elections, despite the SNP's disappointing showing.

I am probably not the only one to be rather concerned about any cooperation between the SSP and SNP. The Herald conveniently summarises the difference between the two parties:

SNP

Nationalist first and (mostly) left-of-centre second.

Wants a referendum for independence within three years of a Holyrood majority.

Pro-EU and pro-single currency.

Favours a slimmed down monarchy although some members are republicans.

SSP

Socialist first and supports independence second.

Wants a referendum immediately, assuming the convention has already agreed a constitution for immediate implementation.

Anti-euro but would remain in an anti-big business and more democratic "people's Europe".

Avowedly republican.

So one of them is "Nationalist first" and the other "Socialist first". Oh dear. I seem to recall that putting nationalism and socialism together can lead to just a little bit of trouble.

Socialist economics

We have here some interesting statistics on expenditure by the smaller parties during the recent Scottish election:

The Electoral Commission figures also give a useful indication as to how much money is needed to secure the election of an MSP. But the statistics do show that some parties were more economical than others.

The Liberal Democrats spent £130,358 on the campaign. This brought them a return of 17 MSPs and 286,150 first-past-the-post votes, the equivalent of £7,668 per MSP and 45p per vote.

The Scottish Green Party spent £65,852 on the election campaign and won seven seats. That represents £9,407 per MSP and 51p per vote.

The Scottish Socialists were not quite as economical, spending £74,361 on the campaign and winning six seats at £12,393 per MSP and 56p per vote.

The most effective small party was the Senior Citizens Unity Party, which contested just two regions and had one of its candidates, John Swinburne, elected, all for an investment of just £3,558 - the equivalent of £3,558 per MSP and a miserly 16p per vote.

This article was drawn to my attention by S Dubh who points out:

Even in getting their candidates elected to the Scottish Parliament, the Greens and crypto-Trotskyite "Scottish Socialists" manage to come top in having spent the most per vote cast for them.

Surely a pertinent thought for those misguided or naive enough to vote for them, although I'm not optimistic on the matter.

That's quite correct. I note that SSP leader Tommy Sheridan has been sent to jail for a week because he refused to pay a fine. Tory MSP, Bill Aitken, rightly complains about the waste of public money. The fine (plus the cost of his prosecution) should have been deducted from Sheridan's parliamentary salary. Instead, we taxpayers get to pay for Sheridan's wages and for his incarceration.

How the EU defines fairness

It looks as if Ryanair's services from Scotland to France and Belgium are under threat:

Two destinations from the airline's Scottish base at Prestwick could be at risk if established carriers or airports succeed in forcing a European Commission crackdown.

Earlier this week, the company was forced to withdraw its Stansted-Strasbourg route - from September 24 - after an Air France subsidiary obtained a ruling that the French airport had improperly used public funds to give incentives to Ryanair worth nearly £1m.

Now, I agree that airports shouldn't be using taxpayers' money to attract new operators but it's a bit of a cheek for Air France to be complaining. Just how much "public" money has been spent bailing out the French airline over the last several decades? Let's have a really level playing field with no subsidies to airports or airlines. I'd put my money on Ryanair, not Air France, as the winner.

It's the culture, stupid

One of the most interesting talks at the Book Festival last week was given by Dr Carol Craig, author of The Scots' Crisis of Confidence. Many Scottish politicians now accept that we are woefully undersupplied with entrepreneurs and that the cause needs to be found. Dr Craig believes that Scotland remains strongly influenced by the country’s Calvinist past – with both positive and negative results. Benefits include an enduring respect for education, a love of logic and principles and an individual sense of mission. But there is a downside that partly explains the book's listing of what Craig sees as “the most important barriers to the development of Scottish self-confidence" and hence entrepreneurship:

A strong tendency to criticise and focus on what is wrong with something rather than to praise, appreciate or be positive.

An overwhelming sense that people’s behaviour can be judged right or wrong, worthwhile or useless.

A prevailing notion that if anyone makes a mistake or does anything wrong, no excuses will be permitted in their defence and that they should be blamed and criticised for their misdemeanours.

An underdeveloped sense of privacy: everything you do in life could be the focus of others’ criticism and censure.

A general belief that you are not OK just as you are and that you must compete and prove your worth.

A strong sense of egalitarian values which stress that no one is more important than anyone else and a culture where people are routinely put down if they are seen to get above themselves.

A prevailing belief that it is better if people do not like themselves too much.

A strong sense that if you question Scottish values or step outside conventional behaviour or opinions your very right to call yourself “Scottish” may be under threat.

Dr Craig tells us that: "We must cease the endless quest for Scottishness and renounce our previous obsession with Scottish identity.... In place of the quest for Scottish identity we need a quest for individual identity. We need to encourage individual Scots to go forth and be themselves."

At most, only twenty percent of Scotland's problems are amenable to political solutions, we were told at the talk. The rest depends on a national culture that needs to be more individualistic. Perhaps everything is not the fault of the politicians.

I want my share

The saga of Scotland's right to buy legislation continues. As with all such matters, we can't depend on property owners to put up a principled defence of their rights:

Although none object to community ownership, they question the use of public funds for the First Minister’s plans.

But the use of public funds is at the heart of "community ownership". There has always been a "right to buy" for anyone with the necessary cash whenever an owner willingly puts his property on the market. No legislation was necessary to maintain that right.

Now, it is proposed to extend the phoney rights:

Jack McConnell, the First Minister, unveiled proposals to widen opportunities under the right-to-buy scheme, from settlements of 3,000 people to those of 10,000. This would mean an extra 117 communities being given first refusal on buying land if the owner puts it up for sale.

The entire Highlands and Islands outside Inverness would qualify, with places such as Stornoway, Thurso and Oban all able to mount a bid to buy land up for sale...

...He also hinted that the Scottish Land Fund, which was set up to help buy-outs, will be increased in line with demand for future takeovers. The fund was set up in 2001 with £10 million which has almost been spent, although a £5 million top-up was announced recently.

Mr McConnell added: "The budget is strong and has managed to maintain the buy-outs so far. We are committed to seeing this through."

McConnell talks about removing "the barriers to economic and social growth." The biggest barrier to such growth is uncertainty of property rights. If McConnell doesn't understand that he should visit Zimbabwe.

Let's look on the bright side, though. When this legislation is extended to the Lowlands, the Freedom and Whisky "community" will demand its share of public funding. I plan to live in Edinburgh Castle.

Into the lioness’s den

Yesterday afternoon I paid my latest visit to the Edinburgh Book Festival. The speaker was none other than that doyenne of politically correct thinking, Polly Toynbee. Her audience was predominantly young to middle aged, middle class, female, English and on her side. No economically illiterate comment went without applause. She wanted the minimum wage level increased to the level of the “more civilised” countries elsewhere in Europe. It was a pity though, said Polly, that unemployment was a bit high on the continent! The higher “minimum wage” in places like France and Germany means, of course, that for many the actual wage is zero.

Polly said that inheritance tax “gives to those who have”! A slip of the tongue, perhaps? She told us of when she had been covering George Bush’s election campaign and he had called for the “abolition of the death penalty”. A scoop, thought Polly. But no. GWB meant that he wanted to abolish America’s inheritance tax. Polly proclaimed to the audience: “Imagine calling inheritance tax ‘the death penalty.’” “But it is,” I shouted out. Four hundred angry leftists stared at me.

On and on she went. Prices in supermarkets are similar because “there is an unspoken cartel.” “Shouldn’t companies be run from the bottom up?” asked a questioner. Polly agreed. There is a “continuum of western countries that runs from high tax Sweden to low tax America.” Guess which one met with Polly’s approval? I waved my hand to point out that Scotland, not Sweden, has the highest level of state expenditure per-capita in Europe and that Sweden is now poorer than Mississippi. The chairwoman, Ruth Wishart, Scotland’s own Polly Toynbee, didn’t pick me to speak: my views on inheritance tax had probably put me beyond the pale. As I left, a young man turned to me saying, “Wasn’t that fantastic?” "Yes," I agreed. “It’s not every day that we get to hear the silliest woman in the country.”

Wool standard

I have hitherto been a supporter of the gold standard. Today I note that the price of gold has fallen somewhat:

GOLD prices eased yesterday as the market kept half an eye on the flailing euro, which fell more than 1 per cent against the dollar, but the price was still underpinned by Middle East tension.

So gold has lost a little of its value. What can replace it? I have found the answer:

PUT the carving knife back in the block, screw the top back on the mint sauce bottle, Tophill Joe is one little lamb whose long-term future looks secure.

The Scottish farming syndicate which purchased the six-month old Texel ram lamb at auction in Lanark yesterday did not pay a world record-breaking £128,100 just to turn the youngster into lamb chops. TJ can look forward to a tupper's life from now on.

So, rather than investing in Krugerrands, these Scottish farmers have seen the future and the future is woollen:

The five farmers who clubbed together to buy the animal for breeding purposes clearly decided that they might as well be hung for a lamb as a sheep.

Colin Mair, Willie Knox, Sandy Lee, and Margaret Lyon, all from Aberdeenshire, and Robert Forsyth from Wigtonshire, officially paid out 122,000 guineas (traditionally, pedigree sheep are sold in the antiquated currency). Mr Forsyth said: "We decided on Wednesday night that this was the one we wanted. We were prepared to go as far as £100,000, but when you see a sheep like this you never know."

To think that with just 3,122 lambs you could buy yourself a Scottish parliament building.

Business bullshit

Accountants Ernst & Young are combining their Scottish and Northern Irish operations with those based in Leeds. I have no idea whether this change makes sense or not and it is of course up to E&Y to decide such matters. The managing partner in Scotland states:

"In terms of running Scotland, in terms of clients and marketing, I am still running all of that. The only difference is my boss is in Leeds and not London."

He added: "This is good news for our people and our clients in the region."

So Ernst & Young's "people" can be happy, can't they?

Well, perhaps not:

A handful of jobs will be lost in Glasgow as the region consolidates financial processing at its Newcastle office.

Why do some business people act so crassly? The "handful" of people "let go" will rightly be angry at this kind of talk. It's much better to be honest about the changes and cut out the managerial bullshit. This is why some people are attracted to socialism.

Is taxation moral?

Last Friday there was an extraordinary article in the business section of The Scotsman

Martyn Jones is a tax partner with a well-known firm of Scottish lawyers. He writes:

The assertion that there are social needs that would not be met without taxes is also questionable.

How very true.

Mr Jones's article is a critique of an attack by the chairman of the Inland Revenue on tax avoidance. Unlike tax evasion (breaking the tax law), tax avoidance (optimising one's tax affairs within the law) is perfectly legal. It is quite outrageous that the head of the Revenue has spoken out against those who operate within the tax laws. But note the quote above from Mr Jones. By questioning the need for taxation this pillar of the Scottish legal establishment has surely outed himself as some kind of anarcho-capitalist! As Mr Jones states:

Unless it can be proved that the government always acts for good, suggesting morality as the basis for payment means there can be a strong case for refusing to hand over taxes.

I have never seen any proof that government always acts for "good" and therefore agree with Mr Jones when he tells us that:

Sir Nicholas’ sweeping assertion before the Chartered Institute of Taxation was little more than political dogma.

As my old lapel button says: Taxation is Theft.

More numerous than tourists in Edinburgh

I know that Andrew Duffin will say that we can avoid midges by sailing offshore and that Colin Beveridge believes that the answer is to fly above the beasties, but some of us attract them no matter what. And so I must applaud another step forward in the never-ending battle against the tiresome critters:

Following recent news of a commercial machine which is said to successfully clear the blood-sucking insect from wide swathes of countryside, two Highland companies have now come up with a domestic midge trap.

The market for this invention is vast:

That there are plenty of midges to go round is hardly in doubt. In the west of Scotland, one hectare can contain 24 million midge larvae.

And to think that Scotland is supposed to be under populated.

Taking the Stagecoach

Here is some good news for Fife residents:

COMMUTERS on one of the busiest road and rail routes in Scotland are being offered an alternative after the launch yesterday of the UK's first commercially-run combined bus and taxi operation.

Well it's certainly time for the introduction of the jitney into the UK. This is the only way to get most road commuters onto public transport. The proposed service is to operate every 10 minutes for 20 hours per day; collecting commuters from their homes and taking them back again at night. Who wants to stand at a windswept bustop in the Scottish winter?

Naturally, taxi drivers are unhappy:

However, private hire drivers criticised the new scheme. John Aitchison, a partner in Ace Taxis, based in Dunfermline, said several private hire firms had formed an action group to seek legal advice and complain to the Office of Fair Trading.

He said they were unhappy that Stagecoach's taxibuses were allowed to advertise their name and number on the outside of the vehicle when private hire drivers were not allowed to do so.

OK, let the taxis advertise but full marks to Stagecoach for enabling Fifers to read the paper on the way to work rather than cursing the interminable queue at the Forth Road Bridge.

Our futures?

At the Book Festival yesterday historian Norman Davies said that no political entity could endure without a common language. In fifty years' time Europe would have a common language and the continent would then be called “England” because English would be the language!

In fifty years' time the US would be called “Los Estados Unidos.”

What is ethical?

The Social Market Foundation is concerned about the matter of "Ethical" Investing:

The Social Market Foundation said that although Scots have good intentions they do not have the information to make proper judgements.

The research showed that 86% of Scots consumers prefer to purchase goods and services from companies that are socially and environmentally responsible.

Scots are also most enthusiastic about new government regulation (40%) and have the highest expectations of business to improve its labelling (76%).

They also supported tax breaks for firms who make the grade and those that do not should be named and shamed, survey respondents said.

But what is ethical and who decides? The idea of "tax breaks" for so-called ethical investments fills me with horror. Such intervention would merely reflect the current hobbyhorses of the politically correct members of the great and the good. If there is going to any "naming and shaming" let's get ready for a consumer boycott of any company that helps the government introduce ID cards.

An apology

Blogging is light at the moment as a result of all too many visits to the Edinburgh Book Festival. This morning I heard Peter Hitchens of the Mail on Sunday and have just finished listening to Roy Greenslade, previously editor of the Daily Mirror. Later today there is a talk by David Steel, who was leader of the Liberal Party and then Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament. I shall see the day out with crime writer Quintin Jardine. Back to normal tomorrow I expect.

Scotland's economy

According to The Scotsman today:

SCOTLAND’s contribution to the UK economy has been in freefall since 1994, it emerged yesterday - a decline which is now costing the country some £11 billion in lost wealth every year.

Naturally, opposition politicians are making a noise:

The Scottish National Party yesterday said that the missing £11.2bn reflected business in Scotland taking flight through its lack of faith in the Scottish Executive to create a business-friendly environment.

Jim Mather, the party’s economic spokesman, focused on the substantially revised figures on London - whose GDP per head stood at £18,100 in 1999.

Scotland’s figure of £12,800 per head, he said, was inexcusable. "As a nation, we are now more than £5,000 poorer for every man, woman and child than in London. That is the price we are paying for staying part of the UK."

Commenting on that final paragraph, Andrew Duffin has pointed out:

The first sentence is pretty much correct. The last one, of course, should read "That is the price we pay for sticking with outdated statist nostrums"

It's certainly true to say that the Executive hasn't created a "business-friendly environment" but, with the possible exception of Jim Mather himself, the pronouncements of SNP politicians don't indicate that independence would make any difference. Scotland needs a profound cultural change if it is to become more prosperous. That would mean the generation of home grown businesses rather than being overly reliant on tax-funded inward investment.

Scotland's R&D is well below the UK average:

Iain Duff, an economist at the Scottish Council for Development and Industry, said there remains no policy in place that might cause a major turn-around in the Scottish share of the UK total increasing.

He said: "It couldn’t get any worse - there is only one way for the figures to go and that is up. It’s a perennial problem for Scotland as historically we’ve always been poor at R&D spending.

"I believe part of it is a reflection of the Scottish economy - it’s a branch plant economy where the R&D spending is not carried out in Scotland."

Note that "branch plant economy." We have used huge amounts of public money to bribe non-Scottish companies to come here and all too often they leave at the first sign of an economic downturn. Far better to leave the money in the hands of local businessmen, get rid of economic "development" agencies and watch what can be achieved free from the dead hand of government.

(The links on this post are somewhat temperamental. You may have to click a few times to get the correct article.)

Back to Charlotte Square

I don't usually agree with the views of Ruth Wishart but today I do:

Nowhere is that appetite for engaging with issues, events, and ideas more evident than at the International Book Festival, where some of the world's most provocative writers, historians, and commentators meet some of the world's most enthusiastic audiences. There is a spell now being woven in that sprawling, tented village which has captivated many thousands of new adherents.

The Book Festival is indeed wonderful. I have already mentioned my first two visits and was there again on the next two days. On Tuesday there was a talk on "Writing Local History" by Brian Osborne, co-author of The Clyde at War and author of several other books on Scottish history. I had not heard of Brian before but enjoyed a very enthusiastic talk by one who clearly loves his subject.

The next evening I attended a panel discussion organised by the Institute of Ideas as part of their commemoration of Orwell's centenary. Claire Fox chaired The Art of Political Journalism with speakers Iain Macwhirter (Sunday Herald), Brendan O'Neil (spiked online), Chris Shaw (Channel 5) and Lindsey Hilsum (Channel 4).

I was pleasantly surprised to hear Macwhirter defend "objective truth" and make his claim that New Labour spin was a consequence of so many of Blair's people being educated by the cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School. There was an amusing discussion about Fox Television. Claire Fox (presumably no relation!) mentioned it as an example of a new type of politically committed television journalism. Shaw responded by claiming that although Fox TV sometimes pushed a conservative viewpoint, most of its programmes were politically neutral "like CNN." None of the panel seemed to know that millions of Americans think that CNN is the "Clinton News Network" or even the "Commie News Network".

Several members of the audience complained about innumeracy in media reporting and in government pronouncements. Macwhirter agreed and denounced Gordon Brown's use of "double-counting" when announcing spending plans. The panel members were certainly not libertarians but all had a healthy disregard for Blair and his crew.

Parent power

There's a right stushie going on in middle class Glasgow concerning recent events at Hutchesons' Grammar School:

The governors at one of Scotland's leading private schools have been accused of gross mismanagement by disgruntled parents.

Some have been angered by the rapid departure of the deputy rector at Glasgow's Hutchesons' Grammar School, which fuelled claims he had been put in an untenable position because of a difficult relationship with the rector.

I don't know whether the "traditionalist" Sandy Strang was forced out or not but there is little doubt that the wishes of the fee-paying parents are more likely to be attended to at Hutchie's than in any state school.

Sheep shouldn't be party leaders

It does seem rather extraordinary that John Swinney, the boss of the Scottish Nationalists, thinks that up to one third of his party's members may support the leadership challenger, Bill Wilson, "a little-known SNP activist from the West of Scotland."

Dr Wilson and his friends think that Swinney has undersold the case for independence. Swinney wants an SNP victory at Holyrood to be followed by an independence referendum. The Wilsonites think that independence should automatically result after an SNP win with no referendum being required. But neither Swinney nor Wilson seems to be able to answer the question: How can Scotland be "independent" in Europe? And "independence in Europe" has been the slogan of the SNP for years.

The European Union has destroyed Scotland's fishing industry and now threatens the sheep trade:

It would be virtually impossible to stage Europe’s largest one day sale of sheep at Lairg in Sutherland if the EU’s latest proposals covering the welfare of animals in transit are approved.

That was the unanimous view expressed in Lairg yesterday when 25,000 North Country Cheviot lambs were offered for sale. NFU Scotland, the British Veterinary Association and the Institute of Auctioneers and Appraisers in Scotland, who in addition have the support of the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, joined forces in condemning the proposals from Brussels.

This is typical of the over-regulation emanating from Brussels. As the farmers' spokesman said:

An event like this at Lairg clearly highlights the problems and takes no account of the market situation and the practical logistics.

I suspect that areas like Scotland, far from the economic centre of Europe, suffer most from the EU's anti-capitalist rules. Bureaucrats don't care about "market situations" or "practical logistics", but if Swinney or Wilson wants a prosperous and successful Scotland they need to speak out against the EU's red tape machine.

A tale of two airports

Michael O'Leary, boss of Ryanair, has upset the owners of Glasgow International Airport:

He wants it renamed Glasgow Domestic and the "International" tag transferred to Prestwick Airport.

Prestwick serves more international destinations than Glasgow although the latter airport carries far more passengers.

In defence of Glasgow airport:

A BAA spokesman said: "I'm sure the fact that Glasgow International handled 3.5million international passengers last year, more than Prestwick's entire throughput, coupled with the fact Prestwick is not even in Glasgow, will have a direct bearing on the outcome of this complaint

Oh dear. The BAA spokesman is correct in saying that Prestwick Airport is not in Glasgow but Glasgow Airport is not in Glasgow either!

In the meantime, Ryanair has announced a new route from Prestwick to Gothenburg. According to O'Leary:

"Stockholm is one of our most successful routes in and out of Scotland. A lot of Scandinavians want to fly in the winter when it is dark and cold there. They think Scotland has a Mediterranean-like climate in January and February."

Quite right. The vineyards of the Costa Clyde are particularly fine in the winter months.

1603 and all that

At the Book Festival last night I heard a talk by Christopher Lee who spoke about 1603, his new book on that momentous year:

A great step-change in British history took place in 1603: the year that Elizabeth I died and the monarchy passed from the Tudors to the Stuarts, from the house of Henry VIII to James VI of Scotland who ruled as James I of England. It was also the year the Black Death returned, killing some 30,000 out of a population of only 4 million. This is the story of both the history-makers - Elizabeth, James, Robert Cecil, Shakespeare, Galileo - and of the common people; of turmoil in the Church, state-sponsored piracy and the establishment of new trade routes

Lee, a Cambridge academic I believe, held the audience spellbound with his tales of King James, Walter Raleigh ("Raw-ley") and Robert Cecil ("Sissell"). Shakespeare's manager was described as the Cameron Mackintosh of his day who apparently made more money from bear baiting than from the Bard. I noticed Father of the House of Commons and local MP Tam Dalyell sitting close by.

Later in the evening my wife and I saw and heard further references to 1603 at the Edinburgh Tattoo.

We have ways of making you pay

Although the First Minister was unable to get himself from Orkney to Prestwick on time, Edinburgh's local bureaucrats are more organised:

Officers from the city council’s environmental health department confirmed they would be watching the events closely.

And just what are the "events" attracting such close attention?

Safety chiefs have said they will be monitoring "dominatrix" workshops to be held in a sex dungeon at Edinburgh’s festival of erotica.

That's OK then, I suppose. My taxes at work.

The dominatrix mistress said:

"You have to be aware of what not to do. I was trained in the dungeons of New York and London so I know what I’m doing and I’m confident."

Shouldn't she be working for the Inland Revenue?

And they think they can run the country!

I was born in Annan and grew up in Prestwick. The leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats and Deputy First Minister is Jim Wallace. He also comes from Annan and has screwed up big time in, or rather not in, Prestwick:

JIM WALLACE apologised to one of the world's biggest aviation companies yesterday after he missed an event because he could not get on a flight.

The deputy first minister had been due to make the official opening of BAE Systems' new regional aircraft headquarters at Prestwick airport. He was booked on a stand-by option for the flight from Orkney to Edinburgh, but the fully-booked plane took off without him

This looks like a severe case of incompetence. Who agrees to appear at an important event and books a standby air ticket? That's especially true when flying from Orkney where you can't just jump on another carrier. Full marks to the airline for not kicking off a more organised passenger to make way for the minister.

Book people

Yesterday afternoon my wife and I paid our first visit to the Edinburgh Book Festival and went to a talk given by Radio 4's Nick Clarke and Linda Colley, the historian. The topic was British National Identity. Both speakers gave interesting presentations and afterwards signed copies of their books. Clarke thought that the class system was alive and well in Britain, largely because we did not face the trauma of defeat in either World War. He also condemned the "celebrity culture". Of course, we libertarians use class analysis to examine how individuals use the state to exploit others. The greatest period in our history occurred when businessmen asked for the state to get out of the way rather than to provide special benefits for some. As Linda Colley wrote in her book:

But at a deeper level, these private organisations also bore witness to dissatisfaction with the more formal institutions of the state, to a growing belief that they were too hidebound and too exclusive to carry out all the changes that traders wanted.

She was writing about the 1760's. Eventually we achieved free trade and prosperity followed. I was saddened therefore to hear Colley say that she had no idea why so many British people were concerned about the EU's Social Chapter. The emerging Euro-state has also become "too hidebound and too exclusive." Why can't Linda Colley see that?

(Incidentally, I noticed that the programme showed the 1130 slot being filled by (1) a Dinosaur Workshop and (2) Roy Hattersley. Couldn't these have been combined as "Old Labour"?)

How not to run a business

The transfer of ownership of council houses from the local authority to a housing association has run into trouble in the Borders:

Board members of the Scottish Borders Housing Association (SBHA) will be told tonight that a variety of financial and operational issues are having a "serious negative impact" on the association’s business plan.

A report to be considered at the meeting says: "In view of the extent and severity of the adverse impacts on the business plan since transfer, it is not certain that revised business plans can accommodate the resultant additional costs and still enable SBHA to meet all commitments."

The bill for the Scottish parliament building is now expected to be more than ten times the original estimate. The Scottish Executive has underspent its budget for the past year by some £500 million without quite knowing how. So it's no real surprise to learn that local bureaucrats are no more competent down in the Borders. They've underestimated the need for house repairs, made "incorrect calculations" in the housing association business plan and now discover that more houses are empty than expected. Well, these things happen with business plans - not that we are talking about a real "business", of course. But how on earth can they forget to allow for the cost of their own head office? I don't suppose that they could forget about the new HQ and move the tax-consumers into the empty houses.

I also note that the 6,728 council houses were transferred to the housing association for £3,469 each, with further expenditure of £10,969 per house planned over the next ten years. The taxpayers are getting less than £4,000 per house and yet the housing association can't cope financially, although its chairman was "confident the problems could be overcome with the assistance from the Scottish Executive." Well, duh - whose couldn't?

This whole affair stinks. The Borders Council should just give the houses away to the tenants and let them pay for future repairs and maintenance. Yes, we taxpayers would have been ripped-off yet again, but enough is enough: end the dependency culture now and make a fresh start.